Translated excerpt about Dermestidae:
35. Dermestes elongatus Lec. is moved by Crotch to bicolor Fbr.; I unite this species with peruvianus Casteln.; on the other hand, D. pulcher Lec. is presumably to be moved to bicolor Fabr.
36. Derm. chinensis Motsch. = cadaverinus Fabr.
37. Derm. rufofuscus Soll. = cadav. var. domesticus Germ.
38. Derm. Mannerheimi Leconte = caninus Germ.
39. Derm. elongatus Hope = peruvianus Casteln.
40. Derm. elegans Solsky = elegans Gebler.
41. Derm. fasciatus Lec. is probably only a caninus Germ. var. with single-colored elytra.
42. Derm. muscorum Lec. I consider to be carnivorus Fbr.; the same also occurs in North America and is not mentioned by Leconte.
43. Derm. rattus Lec. is hardly different from talpinus.
44. Anthrenus capensis Gnerin [Guérin] = cinereus Thunberg.
45. Anthr. grandis Thunberg = Trogodema [Trogoderma] versicolor Creutr [Creutzer].
46. Anthr. tomentosus Thunb. = Verbascci [Verbasci] Lin. (varius Fabr.)
47. Anthr. bifasciatus Thunb. is an Attagenus (fasciato-punctatus Rttr.); the name is already taken in this genus.
48. Anthr. castaneae Melsh. is according to Crotch only muscorum L., but certainly a valid species, since the scales are formed somewhat differently; also the white spot at the base of the pronotum in front of the scutellum is always missing in it.
49. Orphilus subnitidus Lec. is certainly identical with glabratus Fbr., on the other hand ater Er. [is a] valid species; Crotch wrongly moves both to glabratus.
Notes from editor: Anthrenus castaneae Melsheimer, 1844 mentioned here likely refers to Anthrenus blanci Beal, 1998 due to character mentioned. Half of statements are incorrect synonymies